The team that prevents million-dollar outages

Principal Exchange Online engineers with names on every runbook

We are 3 Microsoft MVPs, ex-Microsoft engineers, and enterprise SRE leaders. Every guide lists who wrote it, when it was reviewed, and how to verify it in production. Our clients collectively avoid $2M–$10M annually in downtime, audit penalties, and compliance exposure through our threat-intelligence driven guidance and change-control rigor.

3× Microsoft MVPs Ex-Microsoft engineers Enterprise SRE leadership Security-first review

About ExchangeGuardians

Born from a single CA lockout that shut down a 12,000-user organization for 8 hours. We exist to prevent that from happening to you.

🎯 Our Mission

Deliver diagnostic-first, production-safe Exchange Online and Microsoft 365 security guidance that enterprise IT teams can trust in their most critical incidents. No generic advice—every runbook is written by a named principal engineer with 10+ years Microsoft ecosystem experience.

📊 By the Numbers

  • 2,800+ incidents resolved since founding
  • 380+ enterprise clients across 47 countries
  • 98.4% resolution rate without escalation
  • 28-minute median time to diagnostic plan

🏢 Why We Specialize in Microsoft Ecosystems

All three founders came from enterprises where Exchange downtime = board-level incident. We saw firsthand how generic support fails when authentication breaks, mail flow stops, or security policies lock out executives. We built ExchangeGuardians to be what we needed in those moments: expert-level guidance, audit-safe procedures, and engineers who understand compliance pressure.

🛡️ Our Approach

  • No credentials requested — Read-only diagnostics only
  • Change control aligned — Audit-ready documentation
  • Named engineer accountability — Every guide signed by author
  • Security-first review — Peer validation on all critical procedures

Our Founding Story

In March 2018, a well-intentioned conditional access policy change locked 12,000 users out of email, including the entire C-suite during quarterly earnings. The incident lasted 8 hours because:

  1. Generic Microsoft support didn't understand our hybrid setup
  2. Community forums had conflicting advice (some dangerous)
  3. No one would put their name on a rollback procedure
  4. Our change board demanded audit trails we couldn't produce

That night, we committed to building a different kind of support: expert engineers, signed procedures, production-safe guidance, audit-ready documentation. ExchangeGuardians was born.

— Amelia Patel, Founder & Principal Engineer

Who writes your guidance

Experience, credentials, and scope of responsibility for each named engineer.

What "Principal Engineer" Means Here

Qualification criteria: 10+ years Exchange/Microsoft 365 experience, 3+ professional certifications (MVP, CISSP, MCSA, or equivalent), documented track record handling 500+ production incidents, peer-reviewed technical publications, and quarterly continuing education on Microsoft security updates.

Accountability: Every guide lists the authoring engineer by name. If a procedure fails in your environment, you can request direct consultation with the author to understand why and adapt the approach.

Review process: All security-critical content reviewed by two engineers (author + peer). All runbooks tested in lab environments before publication. Updates published within 30 days of relevant Microsoft security bulletins.

Principal SRE

Priya Desai

Enterprise SRE lead for collaboration stacks | Focus on reliability engineering, SLOs, and rollback design | ITIL v4, PMP

Drives safety and production readiness. Designs runbook validation checks, rollback triggers, change-control workflows, and incident escalation pathways. See CA policy rollback and mail flow rollback examples.

Reviewed bi-annually; signs all change, SLO, validation, and rollback guidance.

Editorial and safety standards

We publish with the same rigor we expect in enterprise change boards.

Evidence-based

Runbooks map signals to likely causes with error-code matrices, not generic advice. Each step lists validation checks.

Security-reviewed

Changes follow least-privilege, no credential sharing, and align to Microsoft 365 secure defaults and CA policy hygiene.

Fresh and dated

Every article shows authors, last-reviewed date, and version. We retire or revise content when Microsoft updates services.

How we work with you

Clear roles, boundaries, and accountability so you know how to operationalize our guidance.

Change-control ready

Pre-checks, implementation steps, rollback triggers, and validation suitable for CAB approvals. You decide execution path.

Transparent scope

Advisory and co-delivery. We do not store tenant secrets; you approve and perform credentialed actions with us present.

Trust signals

What you can verify about us before you act on any guidance.

24x7 principal coverage

Follow-the-sun engineers with defined handoffs and logging.

Documented SLOs

Time-to-ack and time-to-resolve targets published for P1/P2.

Compliance aligned

Data handling commitments, least-privilege execution, and audit-ready notes.

Ready to validate us?

Review a runbook, meet the authors, or open an incident with production-safe guidance.